Climate Change And What It Means For YOUR Hydraulic Equipment

The apparent trend towards wider extremes in temperature has implications for anyone who designs, operates or services hydraulic equipment: the real possibility of machines having to operate at much lower cold-start temperatures and/or much higher maximum ambient temperatures, than the long-term average. This means more hydraulic machines may find themselves operating in temperature extremes for which they are not equipped. And this has negative implications for machine reliability.

Although far from new, global warming is an issue that's not going away. And whether you believe the science or not, we're currently witnessing evidence of what climate-change scientists have been warning us about for some time: increasing incidence of extreme weather events.

This apparent trend towards wider extremes in temperature has implications for anyone who designs, operates or services hydraulic equipment: the real possibility of machines having to operate at much lower cold-start temperatures and/or much higher maximum ambient temperatures, than the long-term average.

In other words, more hydraulic machines may find themselves operating in temperature extremes for which they are not equipped. This of course, has negative implications for machine reliability.

Because the viscosity of petroleum-based hydraulic oil decreases as its temperature increases and conversely, viscosity increases as temperature decreases, limits for oil viscosity and oil temperature must be considered simultaneously.

Excessively high oil viscosity can result in damage to system components through cavitation. And if temperature drops below the oil's pour point, the system may be damaged in other ways, including possible pressure intensification in hydraulic cylinders.

Low oil viscosity causes loss of lubricating film strength. If load and surface speed remain constant, but elevated operating temperature causes oil viscosity to fall below that required to maintain a hydrodynamic film, boundary lubrication occurs with the possibility of friction, scuffing and adhesive wear.

Exhibit 1 shows how this can manifest itself in an axial piston pump. The gold-colored varnish deposits are evidence that this hydraulic system has been operating at excessive temperatures. Due to low oil viscosity, the lubricating film between piston and bore has been lost. The resulting friction has super-heated the piston causing it to expand in its bore to the point of interference. Once this happens, the resulting tensile force pulls the slipper(s) from the piston(s) -- a.k.a. catastrophic failure.


axial piston tensile failure

    Exhibit 1. Catastrophic failure caused by low fluid viscosity

With the above problems in mind, the perfect hydraulic fluid would have a viscosity index (the change in a fluids viscosity relative to temperature) represented by a horizontal line intercepting the Y axis at 25 centistokes, see exhibit 2.


    Exhibit 2. Temperature/viscosity curve of the perfect hydraulic fluid.

Of course, no such fluid exists. And I don't expect that such a fluid will be developed in my lifetime. But an oil's viscosity index (VI) can be improved by using high VI base stocks such as synthetics and/or by adding polymers called Viscosity Index Improvers to the formulation. High VI hydraulic oils are one of the tools available to help ensure allowable oil viscosity is maintained across a wider operating temperature window.

Beyond the type of oil used, the only other way to ensure hydraulic machines are equipped to cope with 'climate change', is to make sure the oil's actual operating temperature is appropriately controlled. This means making sure adequate cooling capacity and cold-start protection is installed in the system - considering the expected change in climatic conditions.

Very few hydraulic systems have on overall efficiency greater than 80%. And it is possible for an electro-hydraulic servo system to have an overall efficiency as low as 10%! So any hydraulic system that has a large, continuous power output requires a heat exchanger.

But heat exchangers are space-consuming and expensive, so they often end up being undersized for the job. And the problem of insufficient installed cooling capacity is only compounded if the machine encounters ambient temperatures higher than expected.

In addition to the possible loss of full-film lubrication, high-temperature operation also reduces the life of the oil, seals and hoses in the system. So in a 'Global Warming' world, it's better to have too much, rather then too little, installed cooling capacity.

Similarly, at the other end of the scale, to avoid possible cold-start damage, a change to a low pour point synthetic oil and/or the installation of tank heaters may now be required in applications where they weren't required before.

In summary, our climate is changing. So make sure the hydraulic equipment you design, operate or maintain is adequately equipped to cope - or its reliability WILL be compromised. And for more on improving hydraulic system reliability, get "Six Costly Mistakes Most Hydraulics Users Make... And How You Can Avoid Them!" available for FREE download here.

Discuss this Blog Entry 3

on Aug 4, 2014

Are you serious man??
If you’re an engineer it sure is depressing to know that people like you are designing are future
Trying to correlate oil viscosity with "climate change"?
The company I used to work for in R&D all hydraulic or lubrication test was done in extreme conditions far beyond anything your so call "global warming climate change can produce, 20-30 bellow in cold ambient conditions, 120-150 in hot ambient conditions and under normal geographical circumstances so please spare the psychobabble about the none existent man made global warming/climate change…
Next thing you’ll blame oil contamination on the tooth fairy.
How do you know that metal fatigue was not also a factor on your example or a severe hydraulic lock at very high RPM

on Aug 4, 2014

"And whether you believe the science or not, we're currently witnessing evidence of what climate-change scientists have been warning us about for some time: increasing incidence of extreme weather events."

Sorry, but this statement is hogwash.

"Whether you believe the science or not..." This is a a logical fallacy. An appeal to science is an appeal to authority. Unless you've done the science yourself, then you are merely practicing faith, that is, faith in scientists. And in fact, this particular group of scientists you have blindly placed your faith in have had their ethics called on the carpet on more than one occasion.

Now discussing the "extreme weather events" assertion you make, I'll cite one anecdotal article which outlines the fact that there has been an almost completely silent hurricane season this year off the Atlantic coast, a fact that flies in the face of global warming dogma:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/08/29/global-warmists-might...

Are the temperature extremes something that your readers should be concerned about?

I can't answer scientifically for every place around the globe, but let's take me for example. I live in Sacramento CA. Should I be worried about "extreme weather events"?

ABSOLUTELY NOT!

Historical data shows that it's been much hotter here than it has been in the recent past. In fact, you should have written this article 51 years ago:

http://sacramento-ca.knoji.com/10-alltime-hottest-weather-temperature-da...

Talk about missing the boat.

If you want to discuss the hard science of building more reliable hydraulic equipment that can handle hotter temperatures, perhaps for working in the middle East, that's fine, but you don't need to use pseudoscience to convince us its a good idea.

The opening statement of this article is an insult to myself and the other thousands of engineers who read your magazine and prefer to avoid emotional sensationalism, PC BS, and logical fallacy during our daily routine.

Additionally, it is an insult to science itself, which demands not only active participation (in lieu of blind faith) but also continual skepticism. A TRUE scientist will NOT take on faith the findings of others and will ALWAYS be distrustful of the status quo. A TRUE scientist will not trust "scientists" who have everything to gain by pushing a political/economic agenda and everything to lose by opposing it.

You guys have really choked it on this one. What's next? "What does Ethnic Diversity mean for your Hydraulic System?" or how about, "What does Gender Insecurity and Sexual Orientation mean for your Hydraulic System?"

I thought this was a serious magazine:-(

on Aug 4, 2014

Hilarious. This rivals "the onion". I can't stop laughing.

Please or Register to post comments.

What's Hydraulics At Work?

Brendan Casey is a war-weary and battle-scarred veteran of the hydraulics industry.

Blog Archive