Hydraulicspneumatics 2115 198907 Old Timer19a
Hydraulicspneumatics 2115 198907 Old Timer19a
Hydraulicspneumatics 2115 198907 Old Timer19a
Hydraulicspneumatics 2115 198907 Old Timer19a
Hydraulicspneumatics 2115 198907 Old Timer19a

The Old Timer Part 19: Same Valve, Twice the Flow

April 22, 2013
The Hitch Post The Old Timer Part 18: Avoid unwanted intensification Apr.

The Old Timer of Royal Oak, Mich., was a regular contributor to H&P years before we ever even heard of the internet. But most of his advice is just as useful — and interesting — today.

So rather than leave his wisdom printed on pages archived in our storage room, I pulled out issues from the late 1980s and early 1990s and have been reproducing relevant entries in this blog. Here is my 19th entry, which was originally published in the July 1989 issue:

Same valve, twice the flow

We had a pneumatic nut runner on trial in the field using a standard 5-port spool valve plumbed as a 3-way valve — not an unusual arrangement. We got an emergency call from the production people there. A product redesign called for a different nut, and the operation with the new nut was too slow.

They calculated that they needed twice the flow to meet the time requirement. However, the existing valve was already flowing near its maximum capacity, and space didn’t allow for a bigger valve. Could we help? Quickly?

We dug out the catalog on the valve and were delighted to learn that it was a multipurpose design — it could accept pressure at any port. This meant it could perform like two 3-way valves in the same body.

We told our field people to install larger supply lines and bring air into ports A and P. Then we told them to tee lines from ports B and EA together, and connect the combined flow to the nut runner.

They did as we suggested, and the valve performed as predicted, putting the nut runner back in business.

About the Author

Alan Hitchcox Blog | Editor in Chief

Alan joined Hydraulics & Pneumatics in 1987 with experience as a technical magazine editor and in industrial sales. He graduated with a BS in engineering technology from Franklin University and has also worked as a mechanic and service coordinator. He has taken technical courses in fluid power and electronic and digital control at the Milwaukee School of Engineering and the University of Wisconsin and has served on numerous industry committees.

Continue Reading

Motor leakage variations

Oct. 18, 2006
affect low-speed performance

The Impacts of Electrification on Fluid Power Systems

May 15, 2023
Electrification presents challenges as well as opportunities to re-evaluate and improve upon the design of hydraulics and pneumatics.

Sponsored Recommendations

7 Key Considerations for Selecting a Medical Pump

Feb. 6, 2024
Newcomers to medical device design may think pressure and flow rate are sufficient parameters whenselecting a pump. While this may be true in some industrial applications, medical...

How Variable Volume Pumps Work

Feb. 6, 2024
Variable volume pumps, also known as precision dispense pumps, are a positive displacement pump that operates by retracting a piston to aspirate a fluid and then extending the...

What is a Check Valve and How Does it Work?

Feb. 6, 2024
Acheck valve, a non-return or one-way valve, is a mechanical device that allows a gas or liquid to flow freely in one direction while preventing reverse flow in the opposite ...

The Difference Between Calibrated Orifices and Holes

Feb. 6, 2024
Engineers tasked with managing fluid flow talk about both holes and calibrated orifices, but they are two distinct entities. A hole can be any opening, but a calibrated orifice...