To protect the cylinder bore surface against corrosion, a thin stainless-steel liner is installed in the carbon-steel cylinder barrel. The stainless-steel liner doesn’t provide any stability to the cylinder but offers reliable corrosion protection and good wear resistance. To get a rigid connection between the inner liner and outer barrel, both elements were distorted together on a special tube-drawing machine.
Using a piston-shaped tool, which is drawn through the pre-fitted tubes, both were expanded in a way that after releasing the stress behind the piston, the two tubes clamp together gap-free as a composite tube. After the drawing process, the ends of both pieces are sealed by machining and welding together. After that, the liner bore surface is honed like a standard tube to the specified surface quality. Besides very good corrosion properties, another advantage of such a composite tube is that it can be removed and exchanged with a new one in case of damage in the liner surface. Oyster’s 590-mm bore cylinder barrels were produced this way.
Seal and guiding system
The seal and guiding system of the Oyster cylinders require long life, good service accessibility, and chemical compatibility, and tolerate pollution, the possibility of biological growth on the rod surface, and reduced lubrication properties of the fluid. To achieve this, modified seal and guiding elements from the Hunger DFE program were used.
The first internal element is a wiper, to help prevent fluid penetration into the seal and guiding system. Small bypass drill holes prevent a pressure differential across the wiper element. The piston rod is guided by material-modified FI bearing rings. They have a special step-shaped profile that offers an increased support surface against displacements in the direction of motion, and greater clearance between the piston rod and the cylinder head. Even under high side-load conditions or advanced wear on the guide elements, this ensures sufficient clearance to avoid metal-to-metal contact. The material used in the FI bearing elements also guarantees emergency running properties even without fluid.
The sealing system consists of two Hunger TDI-type seals. The first seal on the pressure side is the main seal, followed by an identical second TDI. Whereas the pressurized main seal will show the expected wear behavior, the secondary seal runs non-pressurized with less wear as long as the main seal is fully functional. If the main seal wears out, the secondary seal will still have remaining wear capacity to seal the cylinder. The intention behind this concept is not to have a 100% sealed system but rather an extended life span.
The two TDI seals are followed by an externally adjustable seal system, termed EVD. This spare seal consists of a seal element which is installed with no pretension to the piston rod and an activation unit. This system offers the opportunity to reseal the cylinder in case of worn out TDI seals. To activate the system, a diver must turn the cap of the injection unit mounted to the cylinder head and pressurize it with a special gel. The seal lip of the EVD seal will press against the piston rod surface and reseal the cylinder.
The next three elements, an outer TDI seal, a wiper, and an outer stainless steel scraper share the tasks to keep out sea water, wipe off smaller contaminants from the rod, and break away hard particles and debris.
Seal test rig
To find the right seal profile and seal material, long-term tests were run. To test the seal elements before installation in the Oyster system, a scaled test rig was designed and built to simulate the main operation and environmental conditions of the seals. The rig consists of a speed-controlled drive unit with a gearbox and lever arm which drives a piston rod. This simulates the oscillating rod movement by the Oyster flap. The test rod is guided and sealed in a cylinder tube which is pressurized with the 95% water fluid by an accumulator. The entire cylinder body is submerged in a water basin for cooling and to simulate the subsea environment. Test pressures are to 70 bar, and with an adjustable cycle frequency from 0.5 to 0.7 Hz.
The test rig has been used on different seal materials and designs, and has run over five-million cycles so far. For example, initial designs failed after only 30,000 cycles due to worn seal bodies, bypass stream damage, and excessive leakage. Other designs quickly failed due to cavitation and blow-by effects. Learning from these failures, the latest design has run several million cycles with acceptable wear. Current durability tests are ongoing and will be compared to real-life results of the Oyster 800 in the sea.
Concurrent with testing of the Oyster 800 system, engineering work on the Oyster 801 is pushing forward. This includes a new cylinder design, based on previous versions, but larger scale and with some detail improvements. Also the seal test rig continues running to gain as much possible data and have a lead over the real system. Plans with the Oyster 801 system are to install two units to allow parallel feeding of hydraulic energy into one generator. More-advanced systems with special hydraulic cylinders are planned in the coming years. Future developments will focus on higher reliability, longer service life, larger overall size, and operation with pure water — possibly with seawater in an open circuit.
For more information, contact Ingo Ruehlicke at Hunger Hydraulics GmbH & Co. KG, at email@example.com; and Dipl. Ing. Matthias Haag, Aquamarine Power Ltd., at Matthias.firstname.lastname@example.org.